The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Geological events | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1964 | Ida Doyer Private Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1983 | Songimvelo Game Reserve | Nature Reserve | 100 |
2017 | Oosterbeek Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
2017 | Angel Ridge Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed | - |
Grassland | Grassland - highveld | - |
Shrubland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Songimvelo Nature Reserve (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/songimvelo-nature-reserve-iba-south-africa on 22/11/2024.