The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2007 | 50-60 males | C1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | favourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus | 20 | 25 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo | 5 | 5 | breeding pairs | 100 | not assessed |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
No known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1981 | Park Krajobrazowy Dolina Słupi | Park Krajobrazowy | 99 |
1981 | Grodzisko Borzytuchom | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1982 | Jeziora Sitna | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1982 | Gniazda orła bielika | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1982 | Gołębia Góra | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
2004 | Dolina Słupi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2005 | Jeziora Lobeliowe koło Soszycy | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
2007 | Dolina Huczka | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
2008 | Skotawskie Łąki | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
2008 | Mechowiska Czaple | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
2008 | Źródliskowe Torfowisko | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
2012 | Dolina Słupi | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 11 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest | 72 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land, Ruderal land | 14 |
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands | 8 |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Raised bogs, Water fringe vegetation | 6 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | 72 |
agriculture | 21 |
water management | 6 |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Slupia River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/slupia-river-valley-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.