PL020
Slupia River Valley


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Corncrake Crex crex LC breeding 2007 50-60 males C1

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 favourable very high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus 20 25 breeding pairs 100 favourable
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo 5 5 breeding pairs 100 not assessed

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Forest - moderate (70-90%) near favourable
Wetlands (inland) - moderate (70-90%) near favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Natural system modifications happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happening now whole area/population (>90%) moderate to rapid deterioration very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Residential and commercial development happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Transportation and service corridors happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Energy production and mining happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) slow but significant deterioration high
Biological resource use happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Pollution happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
No known threats happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) no or imperceptible deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1981 Park Krajobrazowy Dolina Słupi Park Krajobrazowy 99
1981 Grodzisko Borzytuchom Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1982 Jeziora Sitna Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1982 Gniazda orła bielika Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1982 Gołębia Góra Rezerwat Przyrody <1
2004 Dolina Słupi Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 100
2005 Jeziora Lobeliowe koło Soszycy Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) <1
2007 Dolina Huczka Rezerwat Przyrody <1
2008 Skotawskie Łąki Rezerwat Przyrody <1
2008 Mechowiska Czaple Rezerwat Przyrody <1
2008 Źródliskowe Torfowisko Rezerwat Przyrody <1
2012 Dolina Słupi Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 11

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Forest Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest 72
Artificial/Terrestrial Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land, Ruderal land 14
Grassland Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands 8
Wetlands (inland) Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Raised bogs, Water fringe vegetation 6
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
forestry 72
agriculture 21
water management 6
hunting -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Slupia River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/slupia-river-valley-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.