The site was identified as important in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coppery-tailed Coucal Centropus cupreicaudus | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Wattled Crane Bugeranus carunculatus | VU | resident | - | present | A1 |
Slaty Egret Egretta vinaceigula | VU | non-breeding | - | present | A1 |
African Skimmer Rynchops flavirostris | LC | resident | - | present | A1 |
Lappet-faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotos | EN | non-breeding | - | present | A1 |
Bradfield's Hornbill Lophoceros bradfieldi | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | non-breeding | - | present | A1 |
Dickinson's Kestrel Falco dickinsoni | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Kurrichane Thrush Turdus libonyana | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Miombo Scrub-robin Tychaedon barbata | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
White-breasted Sunbird Cinnyris talatala | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2005) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2005) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2005 | unfavourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | Unknown | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1972 | Masese | Forest Reserve | 77 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Riverine floodplains | major (>10) |
Forest | Woodland - mixed | minor (<10) |
Shrubland | Scrub - woodland | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Simungoma (Zambia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/simungoma-iba-zambia on 22/11/2024.