The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2022) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2022 | very poor | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
Grassland | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Transportation and service corridors | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Some of area covered (10–49%) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1937 | Nevado de Toluca | National Park (II) | 23 |
2005 | Zona Protectora Forestal los terrenos constitutivos de las cuencas de los ríos Valle de Bravo, Malacatepec, Tilostoc y Temascaltepec | Área de Protección de los Recursos Naturales (VI) | 8 |
2008 | ANP Cerro de los Manantiales | Área Destinada Voluntariamente a la Conservación (VI) | 2 |
2013 | Nevado de Toluca | Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna (VI) | 22 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | 57 | Montane broadleaf evergreen; Pine; Pine-oak; Tropical coniferous; Tropical deciduous; Temperate coniferous |
Grassland | minor (<10) | Alpine & subalpine |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 36 |
rangeland/pastureland | 4 |
not utilised | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sierra de Taxco - Nevado de Toluca (Mexico). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sierra-de-taxco--nevado-de-toluca-iba-mexico on 23/12/2024.