The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japanese Cormorant Phalacrocorax capillatus | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A4i |
Slaty-backed Gull Larus schistisagus | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A4i |
Blakiston's Eagle-owl Bubo blakistoni | EN | resident | 2003 | present | A1, A3 |
Steller's Sea-eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus | VU | winter | 2003 | present | A1 |
Middendorff's Grasshopper-warbler Helopsaltes ochotensis | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
Kamchatka Leaf-warbler Phylloscopus examinandus | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | medium | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1964 | Shiretoko | 国立公園 | 37 |
1980 | Shari dake | 都道府県立自然公園 | 2 |
1980 | Onnebetsudake | 原生自然環境保全地域 | 2 |
1982 | Shiretoko | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 36 |
1984 | Yoroushi | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | <1 |
1990 | Shiretoko | 森林生態系保護地域 | 29 |
2001 | Shiretoko Peninsula | 緑の回廊 | 10 |
2005 | Shiretoko | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 28 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Shiretoko, Mount Syari-dake (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/shiretoko-mount-syari-dake-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.