The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus | LC | resident | 1981-1997 | 20-30 breeding pairs | A2, A3 |
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 1981-1997 | 20-30 breeding pairs | A1, A2, A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | resident | 1981-1997 | 6-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | resident | 1981-1997 | 10-15 breeding pairs | A3 |
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | resident | 1981-1997 | 9-23 breeding pairs | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | low | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Ol'getinskoe (Ol'gitskoe) uschel'e s gornymi shirokolistvennymi lesami | Nature Monument | - |
- | Shoanskiy lednik s istokami reki Armhi | Nature Monument | - |
1971 | Ingushsky | Zakaznik (Federal) | 40 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland | 35 |
Forest | Mixed woodland | 30 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 17 | |
Shrubland | 8 | |
Other | 7 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | 2 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 90 |
nature conservation and research | 40 |
rangeland/pastureland | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Shanskoye ravine (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/shanskoye-ravine-iba-russia-(european) on 22/11/2024.