The site was identified as important in 2022 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater Rhea Rhea americana | NT | resident | 2012 | min 30 individuals | B1a |
Yellow-legged Tinamou Crypturellus noctivagus | NT | resident | 2020 | min 30 individuals | B1a |
White-browed Guan Penelope jacucaca | VU | resident | 2012 | min 30 individuals | A1 |
Hooded Visorbearer Augastes lumachella | NT | resident | 2012-2022 | min 30 individuals | B1a |
Rufous-vented Ground-cuckoo Neomorphus geoffroyi | VU | resident | 2007-2022 | min 30 individuals | A1 |
Lear's Macaw Anodorhynchus leari | EN | resident | 2012-2022 | min 2 individuals | A1 |
Blue-winged Macaw Primolius maracana | NT | resident | 2012 | min 30 individuals | B1a |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2022) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2022. The most recent assessment (2022) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2022 | favourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2006 | Área De Proteção Ambiental Lago De Sobradinho | Área de Proteção Ambiental | 21 |
2018 | Parque Nacional do Boqueirão da Onça | Parque | - |
2018 | APA - Boqueirão da Onça | Área de Proteção Ambiental | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Improved pasture land, Abandoned or fallow farmland, disturbed ground | major (>10) |
Forest | Tropical deciduous forest | major (>10) |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
rangeland/pastureland | minor (<10) |
energy production and mining | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sento Sé / Campo Formoso (Brazil). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sento-sé--campo-formoso-iba-brazil on 22/11/2024.