The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Southern Banded Snake-eagle Circaetus fasciolatus | NT | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Brown-headed Parrot Poicephalus cryptoxanthus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Gorgeous Bushshrike Telophorus viridis | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Lemon-breasted Canary Crithagra citrinipectus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | near favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1975 | Gonarezhou | National Park | 52 |
2002 | Mahenye | Wildlife Management Area | 33 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 73 | |
Shrubland | 26 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Save - Runde junction (Zimbabwe). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/save--runde-junction-iba-zimbabwe on 23/11/2024.