The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yellow-eyed Pigeon Columba eversmanni | VU | breeding | 2003-2006 | 30-40 breeding pairs | A1, A3 |
Egyptian Nightjar Caprimulgus aegyptius | LC | breeding | 2003-2006 | 5-8 breeding pairs | A3 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2003-2006 | 60-65 individuals | A1 |
White-winged Woodpecker Dendrocopos leucopterus | LC | resident | 2003-2006 | 4-6 breeding pairs | A3 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | resident | 2003-2006 | 2-4 individuals | A1 |
Great Tit Parus major | LC | resident | 2003-2006 | 10-12 breeding pairs | A3 |
Sykes's Warbler Iduna rama | LC | breeding | 2003-2006 | 8-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
Streaked Scrub-warbler Scotocerca inquieta | LC | breeding | 2003-2006 | 4-6 breeding pairs | A3 |
Red-headed Bunting Emberiza bruniceps | LC | breeding | 2003-2006 | 30-35 breeding pairs | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | not assessed | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1976 | Зеравшанский | Заказник | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 71 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 14 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 9 | |
Shrubland | 6 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 90 |
agriculture | 9 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sarazm (Tajikistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sarazm-iba-tajikistan on 23/11/2024.