The site was identified as important in 2020 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba | LC | breeding | 2005-2008 | 193 individuals | A4i |
Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba | LC | resident | 2016-2020 | 6-350 individuals | A4 |
Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis | NT | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 1-59 individuals | B1a |
Peruvian Pelican Pelecanus thagus | NT | resident | 2016-2020 | 3-201 individuals | B1a |
Red-legged Cormorant Poikilocarbo gaimardi | NT | resident | 2016-2020 | 3-231 individuals | B1a |
Guanay Cormorant Leucocarbo bougainvilliorum | NT | resident | 2016-2020 | 3-7,500 individuals | B1a |
Franklin's Gull Larus pipixcan | LC | non-breeding | 2005-2008 | 10,000 individuals | A4i |
Elegant Tern Thalasseus elegans | NT | non-breeding | 2016-2020 | 2-1,018 individuals | A4, B1a |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2020) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2020. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Península de Hualpén | Nature Sanctuary or Partial Reserve | 100 |
1976 | Península de Hualpén | Santuario de la Naturaleza | 81 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Santuario de la Naturaleza Península de Hualpén (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/santuario-de-la-naturaleza-península-de-hualpén-iba-chile on 23/11/2024.