The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2020 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba | LC | breeding (2005–2008) | 193 birds | A4i |
Coscoroba Swan Coscoroba coscoroba | LC | resident (2016–2020) | 6–350 birds | A4 |
Chilean Flamingo Phoenicopterus chilensis | NT | non-breeding (2016–2020) | 1–59 birds | B1a |
Peruvian Pelican Pelecanus thagus | NT | resident (2016–2020) | 3–201 birds | B1a |
Red-legged Cormorant Poikilocarbo gaimardi | NT | resident (2016–2020) | 3–231 birds | B1a |
Guanay Cormorant Leucocarbo bougainvilliorum | NT | resident (2016–2020) | 3–7,500 birds | B1a |
Franklin's Gull Larus pipixcan | LC | non-breeding (2005–2008) | 10,000 birds | A4i |
Elegant Tern Thalasseus elegans | NT | non-breeding (2016–2020) | 2–1,018 birds | A4, B1a |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2020. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | very poor | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | very poor (<40%) | very poor |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | poor (40–69%) | very poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Península de Hualpén | Nature Sanctuary or Partial Reserve (-) | 100 |
1976 | Península de Hualpén | Santuario de la Naturaleza (IV) | 81 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Santuario de la Naturaleza Península de Hualpén (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/santuario-de-la-naturaleza-península-de-hualpén-iba-chile on 27/12/2024.