The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Streaked Shearwater Calonectris leucomelas | NT | breeding | 2003 | present | A4ii |
Black-tailed Gull Larus crassirostris | LC | resident | 2003 | present | A4i |
A4iii Species group - seabirds | n/a | breeding | 2003 | min 10,000 breeding pairs | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | low | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Geological events | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1981 | Sanganjima | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 100 |
1994 | Rikuchu - Kaigan | National Park | 100 |
2013 | Sanriku Fukko (reconstruction) | 国立公園 | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sanganjima islet (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sanganjima-islet-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.