The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | Unknown | Not assessed | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1985 | Samburu | National Reserve | 56 |
1985 | Buffalo Springs | National Reserve | 44 |
2002 | Kalama Community Wildlife Conservancy | Community Nature Reserve | 21 |
2011 | Nasuulu Community Wildlife Conservancy | Community Nature Reserve | 3 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Woodland - riparian, Lowland forest - riparian | - |
Grassland | Grassland - edaphic, dry | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Samburu and Buffalo Springs National Reserves (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/samburu-and-buffalo-springs-national-reserves-iba-kenya on 22/11/2024.