The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lesser Whistling-duck Dendrocygna javanica | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A4i |
Northern Pintail Anas acuta | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Common Teal Anas crecca | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus | LC | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A4i |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | unknown | 2004 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | Saman Bird Sanctuary | Sanctuary | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Saman Bird Sanctuary (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/saman-bird-sanctuary-iba-india on 22/11/2024.