The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Running Coua Coua cursor | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A2, A3 |
Verreaux's Coua Coua verreauxi | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Olive-capped Coua Coua olivaceiceps | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A3 |
Archbold's Newtonia Newtonia archboldi | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A2, A3 |
Red-shouldered Vanga Calicalicus rufocarpalis | VU | resident | 1997 | present | A2, A3 |
Lafresnaye's Vanga Xenopirostris xenopirostris | NT | resident | 1997 | present | A2, A3 |
Sickle-billed Vanga Falculea palliata | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A3 |
Subdesert Brush-warbler Nesillas lantzii | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A2, A3 |
Sakalava Weaver Ploceus sakalava | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | unfavourable | very high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2017 | Zones humides de l'Onilahy | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 24 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | Bushland & thicket - deciduous | major (>10) |
Forest | Mangrove | minor (<10) |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers & streams | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
unknown | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Saint Augustin Forest (Madagascar). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/saint-augustin-forest-iba-madagascar on 23/11/2024.