The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Madagascar Pratincole Glareola ocularis | NT | non-breeding (1978) | 2,500–10,000 birds | A4i |
Sooty Gull Larus hemprichii | LC | non-breeding (1995) | 410 birds | A4i |
Saunders's Tern Sternula saundersi | LC | non-breeding (1995) | 900 birds | A4i |
Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis | LC | non-breeding (1995) | 270 birds | A4i |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | poor | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Sabaki River Estuary Youth Group | 2006 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sabaki River Mouth (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sabaki-river-mouth-iba-kenya on 24/12/2024.