The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata | LC | passage (2001–2006) | 586 birds | B1i, C3 |
Gadwall Mareca strepera | LC | passage (2001–2006) | 774 birds | B1i, C3 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage (2001–2006) | 26,224 birds | A4iii, C4 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter (2001–2006) | 27,833 birds | A4iii, C4 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | very poor | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata | 201 / 550 (birds) | 37 | very poor | ||
Gadwall Mareca strepera | 251 / 1,160 (birds) | 22 | very poor | ||
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 27,833 / 21,919 (birds) | 100 | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (<4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1984 | Rutland Water | Site of Special Scientific Interest (UK) (IV) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | Mixed woodland |
Grassland | - | |
Shrubland | - | Scrub |
Wetlands (inland) | - | Standing freshwater; Water fringe vegetation |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Rutland Water (United Kingdom). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/rutland-water-iba-united-kingdom on 27/12/2024.