The site was identified as important in 1994 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goliath Heron Ardea goliath | LC | winter | 1977 | 1 individuals | A4i, B1i, B2 |
Great White Egret Ardea alba | LC | winter | 1987-1992 | 250 individuals | B1i |
Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus | NT | winter | 1970-1977 | 3,500 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | winter | 1970-1977 | 1,500 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa lapponica | NT | winter | 1970-1977 | 5,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Caspian Gull Larus cachinnans | LC | winter | 1987-1992 | 3,000 individuals | B1i |
Sind Woodpecker Dendrocopos assimilis | LC | resident | 1977 | 2 individuals | B3 |
Lesser Whitethroat Curruca curruca | LC | winter | 1977 | 10 individuals | B3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1994) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1994. The most recent assessment (1994) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
1994 | not assessed | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1975 | Deltas of Rud-e-Shur, Rud-e-Shirin and Rud-e-Minab | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
2001 | Hara-e Tiab and Minab | Protected Area | 87 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Desert | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Forest | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
rangeland/pastureland | minor (<10) |
forestry | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Rud-i-Shur, Rud-i-Shirin and Rud-i-Minab deltas (Iran, Islamic Republic of). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/rud-i-shur-rud-i-shirin-and-rud-i-minab-deltas-iba-iran-islamic-republic-of on 23/11/2024.