The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | very unfavourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1975 | Lake Chivero | Recreational Park | 100 |
2013 | Lake Chivero and Manyame | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 84 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 78 | |
Shrubland | 21 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes and pools | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Robert McIlwaine Recreational Park (Zimbabwe). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/robert-mcilwaine-recreational-park-iba-zimbabwe on 22/11/2024.