The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Swamp Francolin Ortygornis gularis | NT | resident (2002) | present | A1 |
Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis | CR | resident (2002) | present | A1 |
Greater Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius | NT | breeding (2004) | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | resident (2002) | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding (2002) | present | A1 |
Slender-billed Vulture Gyps tenuirostris | CR | non-breeding (2002) | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter (2004) | present | A1 |
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis | VU | resident (2002) | present | A1 |
Jerdon's Babbler Chrysomma altirostre | VU | resident (2004) | present | A1 |
Black-breasted Parrotbill Paradoxornis flavirostris | VU | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2 |
Marsh Babbler Pellorneum palustre | VU | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2 |
White-throated Bushchat Saxicola insignis | VU | winter (2004) | present | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | low | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Ripu-Chirang | Sanctuary (-) | - |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ripu and Chirang Reserve Forests (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ripu-and-chirang-reserve-forests-iba-india on 10/01/2025.