The site was identified as important in 2019 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chilean Tinamou Nothoprocta perdicaria | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-10 individuals | A2 |
Moustached Turca Pteroptochos megapodius | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-10 individuals | A2 |
White-throated Tapaculo Scelorchilus albicollis | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-8 individuals | A2 |
Crag Earthcreeper Ochetorhynchus melanurus | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-6 individuals | A2 |
Dusky-tailed Canastero Pseudasthenes humicola | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-11 individuals | A2 |
Chilean Mockingbird Mimus thenca | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-20 individuals | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2019) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2019. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1984 | Las Chinchillas | Reserva Nacional | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | Arid lowland scrub, Arid montane scrub | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Reserva Nacional Las Chinchillas (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/reserva-nacional-las-chinchillas-iba-chile on 22/11/2024.