The site was identified as important in 2014 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wrybill Anarhynchus frontalis | VU | breeding | 2006-2010 | 67-254 breeding pairs | A1, A4i |
Black-billed Gull Larus bulleri | NT | breeding | 1970-2014 | 985-3,012 breeding pairs | A1, A4i |
Black-fronted Tern Chlidonias albostriatus | EN | breeding | 1982-2010 | 218-524 breeding pairs | A1, A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2014) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2014. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | - |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | Rangitata Riverbed Clarke Flat | Stewardship Area | <1 |
1987 | Rangitata Riverbed Rangitata Huts | Stewardship Area | <1 |
1987 | Rangitata Riverbed Peel View | Stewardship Area | <1 |
1987 | Rangitata Riverbed Cain Flat | Stewardship Area | <1 |
1987 | Rangitata Gorge | Stewardship Area | <1 |
1987 | Upper Rangitata Riverbed | Stewardship Area | 1 |
1988 | Arundel | Stewardship Area | <1 |
1999 | Rangitata Riverbed Ealing | Government Reserve | 1 |
2007 | Tenehaun | Scenic Reserve | <1 |
2008 | Mt Potts | Stewardship Area | 5 |
2008 | Mount Sunday | Conservation Covenant | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | major (>10) | |
Introduced vegetation | major (>10) | |
Shrubland | major (>10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Rangitata River (New Zealand). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/rangitata-river-iba-new-zealand on 22/11/2024.