The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
African Skimmer Rynchops flavirostris | 100 | 552 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Sterna nilotica | 1,200 | 78 | individuals | 7 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1932 | North Maramagambo | Forest Reserve | 11 |
1932 | South Maramagambo | Forest Reserve | 5 |
1952 | Queen Elizabeth | National Park | 76 |
1952 | Kigezi | Wildlife Reserve | 10 |
1959 | Kazinga | Wildlife Sanctuary | 1 |
1979 | Queen Elizabeth National Park | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 100 |
1988 | Lake George | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 6 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Katwe Tourism and Information Centre | 1998 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 51 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 20 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 16 | |
Shrubland | 5 | |
Savanna | 4 | |
Grassland | 2 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
water management | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Queen Elizabeth National Park and Lake George (Uganda). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/queen-elizabeth-national-park-and-lake-george-iba-uganda on 22/11/2024.