Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blyth's Tragopan Tragopan blythii | VU | resident (2002) | present | A1, A2 |
| Dark-rumped Swift Apus acuticauda | NT | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2 |
| White-naped Yuhina Yuhina bakeri | LC | resident (2002) | present | A2 |
| Chevron-breasted Babbler Stachyris roberti | NT | resident (2002) | present | A2 |
| Brown-capped Laughingthrush Trochalopteron austeni | LC | resident (2002) | present | A2 |
| Striped Laughingthrush Trochalopteron virgatum | LC | resident (2002) | present | A2 |
| Grey Sibia Heterophasia gracilis | LC | resident (2002) | present | A2 |
| Streak-throated Barwing Sibia waldeni | LC | resident (2002) | present | A2 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2012 | good | high | very low |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| no | habitat | medium | |
| State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
| Forest | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
| Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Little/none of area covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Unknown | very low |
| Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | Puliebadze | Sanctuary (IV) | 8 |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Forest | - |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| forestry | - |
| nature conservation and research | - |
| tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Puliebadze-Dzukou-Zapfu (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/puliebadze-dzukou-zapfu-iba-india on 23/12/2024.