The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blyth's Tragopan Tragopan blythii | VU | resident | 2002 | present | A1, A2 |
Dark-rumped Swift Apus acuticauda | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
White-naped Yuhina Yuhina bakeri | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Chevron-breasted Babbler Stachyris roberti | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Brown-capped Laughingthrush Trochalopteron austeni | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Striped Laughingthrush Trochalopteron virgatum | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Grey Sibia Heterophasia gracilis | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
Streak-throated Barwing Sibia waldeni | LC | resident | 2002 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | favourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Unknown | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1980 | Puliebadze | Sanctuary | 8 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Puliebadze-Dzukou-Zapfu (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/puliebadze-dzukou-zapfu-iba-india on 22/11/2024.