The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Macropygia magna | NR | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Blue-tailed Imperial-pigeon Ducula concinna | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Pink-headed Imperial-pigeon Ducula rosacea | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphurea | CR | resident | 1993 | present | A1 |
White-tipped Monarch Symposiachrus everetti | EN | resident | 1993 | common | A1, A2 |
Red-chested Flowerpecker Dicaeum maugei | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | favourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Cacatua sulphurea | 2 | 14 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 49 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pulau Tana Jampea (Indonesia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pulau-tana-jampea-iba-indonesia on 22/11/2024.