The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | breeding | 2006 | 20 breeding pairs | A3 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | breeding | 2006 | 50 breeding pairs | A1, A3 |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | non-breeding | 1999 | 50-200 individuals | B1i |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | passage | 1999 | 50-200 individuals | B1i |
Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus | LC | passage | 2006 | 2,500 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus | LC | breeding | 2006 | 150 breeding pairs | B1i |
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | NT | passage | 2006 | 200 individuals | A1 |
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | NT | breeding | 2006 | 1 breeding pairs | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | favourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Desert | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands | 35 |
Desert | Semidesert | 30 |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing brackish and salt water, Standing freshwater | 20 |
Shrubland | Scrub | 10 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Other urban and industrial areas | 5 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 50 |
rangeland/pastureland | 40 |
agriculture | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Prikumskiye steppes (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/prikumskiye-steppes-iba-russia-(european) on 23/11/2024.