The site was identified as important in 2021 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus | NT | winter | 2015 | 5-55 individuals | B1a |
Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus | LC | winter | 2018 | 1,500 individuals | A4, B3a |
Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus | NT | resident | 2020 | 93 individuals | B1a |
Worthen's Sparrow Spizella wortheni | EN | resident | 2015 | 282 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2021) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2021. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | very unfavourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2002 | Llano de la Soledad | Zona Sujeta a Conservación Ecológica | 1 |
2002 | La Hediondilla | Zona Sujeta a Conservación Ecológica | 1 |
2015 | Área de Germoplasma Relevante Rancho La Puerta | Área Destinada Voluntariamente a la Conservación | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | Arid montane scrub, Arid lowland scrub, Scrub | 76 |
Grassland | Northern temperate | 13 |
Forest | Temperate coniferous | 3 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 6 |
rangeland/pastureland | 2 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pradera de Tokio (Mexico). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pradera-de-tokio-iba-mexico on 23/11/2024.