MX232
Pradera de Tokio


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2021 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus NT winter (2015) 5–55 birds B1a
Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus LC winter (2018) 1,500 birds A4, B3a
Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus NT resident (2020) 93 birds B1a
Worthen's Sparrow Spizella wortheni EN resident (2015) 282 birds A1

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2021. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2023 very poor very high medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Grassland moderate (70–90%) poor (40–69%) very poor
Shrubland good (>90%) moderate (70–90%) moderate
Forest good (>90%) moderate (70–90%) moderate

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Natural system modifications happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Pollution happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low
Biological resource use happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Energy production and mining past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Some of area covered (10–49%) A compre­hensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity medium

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
2015 Área de Germoplasma Relevante Rancho La Puerta Área Destinada Voluntariamente a la Conservación (VI) <1

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Shrubland 76 Arid montane scrub; Arid lowland scrub; Scrub
Grassland 13 Northern temperate
Forest 3 Temperate coniferous

Land use

Land use % of IBA
agriculture 6
rangeland/pastureland 2

Land ownership
Tenencia de la tierra: Ejidal y privada.


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pradera de Tokio (Mexico). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pradera-de-tokio-iba-mexico on 23/12/2024.