The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater Rhea Rhea americana | NT | resident | - | present | A1 |
Chaco Chachalaca Ortalis canicollis | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Chaco Owl Strix chacoensis | NT | resident | - | present | A3 |
Cream-backed Woodpecker Campephilus leucopogon | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Black-bodied Woodpecker Hylatomus schulzii | NT | resident | - | present | A1, A3 |
Black-legged Seriema Chunga burmeisteri | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Crested Gallito Rhinocrypta lanceolata | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Great Rufous Woodcreeper Xiphocolaptes major | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Scimitar-billed Woodcreeper Drymornis bridgesii | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Chaco Earthcreeper Tarphonomus certhioides | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Crested Hornero Furnarius cristatus | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Cinereous Black-tyrant Knipolegus striaticeps | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Many-colored Chaco Finch Saltator multicolor | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Black-capped Warbling-finch Microspingus melanoleucus | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | near favourable | very high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Tropical deciduous forest | 96 |
Grassland | 3 | |
Shrubland | Scrub | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pozo Hondo (Paraguay). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pozo-hondo-iba-paraguay on 22/11/2024.