The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Short-clawed Lark Certhilauda chuana | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | near favourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Short-clawed Lark Certhilauda chuana | 150 | 120 | individuals | 80 | near favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1965 | Pietersburg Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 95 | |
Shrubland | 4 | |
Forest | - | |
Grassland | Grassland - edaphic, dry | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | 70 |
water management | 10 |
nature conservation and research | 2 |
unknown | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Polokwane Nature Reserve (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/polokwane-nature-reserve-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.