HR040
Podunavlje and Lower Podravlje


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Greylag Goose Anser anser LC breeding (2010) 140–160 pairs B1i, C3
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT breeding (2010) 260–400 pairs A1, B1i, B2, C1, C2, C6
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana LC breeding (2010) 5–10 pairs C6
Little Crake Zapornia parva LC breeding (2010) 10–50 pairs C6
Black Stork Ciconia nigra LC breeding (2010) 35–55 pairs B2, C2, C6
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia LC passage (2010) 130–1,000 birds A4i, B1i, C2, C6
Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris LC breeding (2010) 8–12 males C6
Common Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus LC breeding (2010) 250–500 pairs B2, C6
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax LC breeding (2010) 90–300 pairs C2, C6
Squacco Heron Ardeola ralloides LC breeding (2010) 5–10 pairs C6
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea LC breeding (2010) 50–75 pairs C2, C6
Great White Egret Ardea alba LC breeding (2010) 20–40 pairs C2, C6
Great White Egret Ardea alba LC winter (2010) 300–400 birds C2, C6
Black-winged Stilt Himantopus himantopus LC breeding (2010) 6–14 pairs C6
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC breeding (2010) 400–600 pairs B1i, B2, C2, C6
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga VU winter (2010) 1–5 birds B1iii, C2, C6
Western Marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus LC breeding (2010) 10–15 pairs C6
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla LC breeding (2010) 48–52 pairs B1iii, B2, C2, C6
Black Kite Milvus migrans LC breeding (2010) 15–25 pairs C6
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis LC breeding (2010) 40–60 pairs B2, C6
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica LC breeding (2010) 15–50 pairs C6
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a winter (2010) min 20,000 birds A4iii, C4

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2013 not assessed high medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes unset unknown

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Biological resource use happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Natural system modifications happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity medium

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
2012 Mura-Drava-Danube UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve (UA) 53


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Podunavlje and Lower Podravlje (Croatia). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/podunavlje-and-lower-podravlje-iba-croatia on 22/12/2024.