The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris | LC | breeding | 2008 | 16 breeding pairs | C6 |
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea | LC | breeding | 2008 | 17 breeding pairs | C6 |
Western Marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus | LC | breeding | 2008 | 16 breeding pairs | C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Greylag Goose Anser anser | 200 | 200 | breeding pairs | 100 | not assessed |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | Laguna de Pitillas | Reserva Natural | 51 |
1989 | Laguna de Dos Reinos | Enclave Natural | 5 |
1990 | Laguna de Pitillas | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 51 |
1990 | Estanca de los Dos Reinos | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 5 |
1996 | Laguna de Pitillas | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | - |
1999 | Laguna de Pitillas | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 80 |
1999 | Estanca de los Dos Reinos | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 5 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Standing brackish and salt water, Water fringe vegetation | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
water management | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pitillas and Dos Reinos lagoons (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pitillas-and-dos-reinos-lagoons-iba-spain on 23/11/2024.