PL039
Pisz forest


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus LC breeding 2004-2009 150-200 breeding pairs C6
Corncrake Crex crex LC breeding 2009 700-800 males C1, C6
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana LC breeding 2004-2009 40-60 males C6
Little Crake Zapornia parva LC breeding 2004-2009 30-50 males C6
Common Crane Grus grus LC breeding 2009 450-550 breeding pairs C6
White Stork Ciconia ciconia LC breeding 2004-2009 250-300 breeding pairs C6
Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris LC breeding 2009 40-60 males C6
Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus LC breeding 2004-2009 60-80 breeding pairs C6
Osprey Pandion haliaetus LC breeding 2004-2005 4-5 breeding pairs C6
European Honey-buzzard Pernis apivorus LC breeding 2009 90-100 breeding pairs C6
Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina LC breeding 1995-2003 80-90 breeding pairs C6
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla LC breeding 2009 31-33 breeding pairs C6
Black Kite Milvus migrans LC breeding 2004-2009 12-14 breeding pairs C6
Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius LC breeding 2009 600-700 breeding pairs C6
Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio LC breeding 2004-2009 2,500-3,000 breeding pairs C6
Woodlark Lullula arborea LC breeding 2004-2005 3,000-3,500 breeding pairs C6

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 not assessed very high negligible
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes unset medium

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Natural system modifications happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Residential and commercial development happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Pollution happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Climate change and severe weather happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification likely in short term (within 4 years) majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Transportation and service corridors likely in short term (within 4 years) majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
No known threats happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) no or imperceptible deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Some of site covered (10-49%) No management planning has taken place Very little or no conservation action taking place negligible

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
- Jezioro Lisiny NR (Peatbog Reserve) Nature Reserve <1
1957 Zakręt Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1958 Jezioro Lisunie Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1958 Strzałowo Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1959 Królewska Sosna Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1963 Ławny Lasek Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1963 Czaplisko-L/awny Lasek NR (Bird Reserve) Nature Reserve <1
1971 Jezioro Pogubie Wielkie NR (Bird Reserve) Nature Reserve <1
1972 Jezioro Pogubie Wielkie Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1972 Jezioro Nidzkie (Landscape Reserve) Nature Reserve 2
1973 Jezioro Nidzkie Rezerwat Przyrody 2
1976 Jezioro Warnołty Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1976 Jezioro Warnoóty Nature Reserve <1
1977 Mazurski Park Krajobrazowy Park Krajobrazowy 31
1982 Równiny Kurpiowskiej i Doliny Dolnej Narwi Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu 2
1983 Krutynia Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1987 Pierwos Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1989 Krutynia Rezerwat Przyrody 1
1991 Piłaki Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1995 Pupy Rezerwat Przyrody <1
1998 Puszczy i Jezior Piskich Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu 11
1998 Otuliny Mazurskiego Parku Krajobrazowego - Zachód Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu 4
1998 Spychowski Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu 4
1998 Otuliny Mazurskiego Parku Krajobrazowego - Wschód Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu 2
1998 Otuliny Mazurskiego Parku Krajobrazowego - Ruciane-Nida Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu 1
1998 Otuliny Mazurskiego Parku Krajobrazowego - Szeroki Bór Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu <1
1998 Otuliny Mazurskiego Parku Krajobrazowego - Kierwik Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu <1
2001 Ostoja Piska Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 34
2004 Puszcza Piska Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 100
2004 Dolina Pisy Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) <1
2008 Mokradła Kolneńskie i Kurpiowskie Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) <1

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Forest Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest 67
Artificial/Terrestrial Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land, Forestry plantations, Urban parks and gardens, Other urban and industrial areas, Ruderal land 18
Wetlands (inland) Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Raised bogs, Water fringe vegetation 15
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
forestry 67
nature conservation and research 45
agriculture 18
fisheries/aquaculture 13
hunting -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pisz forest (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pisz-forest-iba-poland on 22/11/2024.