The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2003 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2003. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2009 | favourable | medium | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the key species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1994 | Phnom Samkos | Wildlife Sanctuary (IV) | 89 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | Perennial crops, orchards and groves; Small settlements, rural gardens |
Forest | - | Lowland evergreen rain forest (tropical); Semi-evergreen rain forest (tropical); Dry deciduous forest (tropical); Hill evergreen forest (subtropical) |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - | |
Shrubland | - | Secondary scrub |
Wetlands (inland) | - | Freshwater lakes and pools; Rivers and streams |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Phnom Samkos (Cambodia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/phnom-samkos-iba-cambodia on 24/01/2025.