The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Magellanic Woodpecker Campephilus magellanicus | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
Austral Parakeet Enicognathus ferrugineus | LC | resident | 2002-2009 | present | A3 |
Black-throated Huet-huet Pteroptochos tarnii | LC | resident | 2000-2002 | present | A3 |
White-throated Treerunner Pygarrhichas albogularis | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
Thorn-tailed Rayadito Aphrastura spinicauda | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
Des Murs's Wiretail Sylviorthorhynchus desmurii | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
Patagonian Tyrant Colorhamphus parvirostris | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
White-browed Ground-tyrant Muscisaxicola albilora | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
Fire-eyed Diucon Xolmis pyrope | LC | resident | 2000-2009 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | not assessed | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Grassland | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Península Antonio Varas (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/península-antonio-varas-iba-chile on 23/11/2024.