The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | resident | 2002 | 10-15 breeding pairs | B2 |
White Stork Ciconia ciconia | LC | breeding | 2002 | 220-230 breeding pairs | B2 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | resident | 2008 | 20-30 individuals | A1 |
Eurasian Thick-knee Burhinus oedicnemus | LC | breeding | 2002 | 10-30 breeding pairs | B2 |
Little Owl Athene noctua | LC | resident | 2002 | 150-300 breeding pairs | B2 |
Eurasian Scops-owl Otus scops | LC | breeding | 2002 | 50-200 breeding pairs | B2 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2002 | 10-30 breeding pairs | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | breeding | 2002 | 750-850 breeding pairs | A1, B2 |
Lesser Grey Shrike Lanius minor | LC | breeding | 2002 | 30-100 breeding pairs | B2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | 850 | 350 | breeding pairs | 42 | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2003 | Lokvi-Golemo Konjare | Spomenik na prirodata | <1 |
2006 | Markovi Kuli | Spomenik na prirodata | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas, Perennial crops, orchards and groves | 89 |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Mixed woodland, Native coniferous woodland | 4 |
Grassland | 1 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pelagonia (North Macedonia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pelagonia-iba-north-macedonia on 23/11/2024.