The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moluccan Scrubfowl Eulipoa wallacei | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Ducula perspicillata | NR | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Salmon-crested Cockatoo Cacatua moluccensis | EN | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Red Lory Eos bornea | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Seram Friarbird Philemon subcorniculatus | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Seram Oriole Oriolus forsteni | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Drab Whistler Pachycephala griseonota | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Pale Cicadabird Edolisoma ceramense | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Moluccan Flycatcher Myiagra galeata | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
Ashy Flowerpecker Dicaeum vulneratum | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | favourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Salmon-crested Cockatoo Cacatua moluccensis | 1 | 55 | unknown | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Geological events | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 85 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pegunungan Paunusa (Indonesia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pegunungan-paunusa-iba-indonesia on 22/11/2024.