The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chilean Pigeon Patagioenas araucana | LC | resident | 2008 | present | A2 |
Slender-billed Parakeet Enicognathus leptorhynchus | LC | resident | 2008 | present | A2 |
Black-throated Huet-huet Pteroptochos tarnii | LC | resident | 2008 | present | A2 |
Chucao Tapaculo Scelorchilus rubecula | LC | resident | 2008 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1976 | Alerzales existentes en el Fundo Potrero de Anay | Santuario de la Naturaleza | 10 |
1983 | Chiloe | Parque Nacional | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Parque Nacional Chiloé (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/parque-nacional-chiloé-iba-chile on 23/11/2024.