Data Zone
The site was identified as important in 2019 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chilean Tinamou Nothoprocta perdicaria | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-8 individuals | A2 |
| Moustached Turca Pteroptochos megapodius | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-13 individuals | A2 |
| White-throated Tapaculo Scelorchilus albicollis | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 1-17 individuals | A2 |
| Dusky-tailed Canastero Pseudasthenes humicola | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | 3-22 individuals | A2 |
| Chilean Mockingbird Mimus thenca | LC | resident | 2015-2019 | max 31 individuals | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2019) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2019. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2019 | favourable | high | high |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| no | habitat | good | |
| State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
| Shrubland | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
| Invasive and other problematic species and genes | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
| Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
| Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1941 | Bosque Fray Jorge | Parque Nacional | 100 |
| 1977 | Bosque Fray Jorge | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 100 |
| Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
|---|---|---|
| Shrubland | Arid lowland scrub, Scrub | major (>10) |
| Forest | Temperate mixed woods | minor (<10) |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| nature conservation and research | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Parque Nacional Bosque de Fray Jorge (Chile). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/parque-nacional-bosque-de-fray-jorge-iba-chile on 22/11/2024.