The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern Pintail Anas acuta | LC | winter | 2001-2006 | 615 individuals | B1i, C3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | near favourable | low | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Brent Goose Branta bernicla | 3,010 | 2,423 | individuals | 81 | near favourable |
Northern Pintail Anas acuta | 600 | 615 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1964 | Pagham Harbour | Local Nature Reserve | 77 |
1986 | Pagham Harbour | Site of Special Scientific Interest (UK) | 100 |
1988 | Pagham Harbour | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
1993 | Pagham Harbour | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2011 | Pagham Harbour | Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) | 51 |
2012 | Pagham Harbour | Nature Reserve | 49 |
2013 | Pagham Harbour | Marine Conservation Zone | 44 |
2014 | Pagham Harbour | Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) | 41 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Mesophile grasslands, Humid grasslands | major (>10) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland | minor (<10) |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) | |
Shrubland | Scrub | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Pagham Harbour (United Kingdom). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/pagham-harbour-iba-united-kingdom on 23/11/2024.