The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cape Spurfowl Pternistis capensis | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Blue Crane Anthropoides paradiseus | VU | non-breeding | - | 2,914-3,484 individuals | A1, A4i |
Black Harrier Circus maurus | EN | resident | - | present | A1 |
Cape Long-billed Lark Certhilauda curvirostris | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Cape Bulbul Pycnonotus capensis | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Cape Sugarbird Promerops cafer | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2, A3 |
Orange-breasted Sunbird Anthobaphes violacea | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2, A3 |
Cape Siskin Crithagra totta | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | very unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Blue Crane Anthropoides paradiseus | 6,000 | 6,000 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Denham's Bustard Neotis denhami | 195 | 195 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Cape Vulture Gyps coprotheres | 210 | 210 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Black Harrier Circus maurus | 100 | 100 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | very poor (< 40%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | major (>10) |
Grassland | - | |
Shrubland | Shrubland - Cape (fynbos) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 20 |
agriculture | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Overberg Wheatbelt (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/overberg-wheatbelt-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.