The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A4i |
Black-naped Tern Sterna sumatrana | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1972 | Okinawakaigan | 国定公園 | 100 |
1976 | Yagaji | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 5 |
2003 | Common fishery right area(Okinawa) | 共同漁業権区域 | 7 |
2005 | Kerama-shoto Coral Reef | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 5 |
2014 | Keramashoto | 国立公園 | 71 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Okinawa coastal islets (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/okinawa-coastal-islets-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.