The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola | LC | breeding | 1995 | 250-350 breeding pairs | B2 |
Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus | LC | resident | 1995 | 100-160 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Spotted Flycatcher Muscicapa striata | LC | breeding | 1995 | 1,200-2,100 breeding pairs | B2 |
Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus | LC | breeding | 1994 | 550-800 breeding pairs | B2 |
Parrot Crossbill Loxia pytyopsittacus | LC | breeding | 1995 | 100-300 breeding pairs | B3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | favourable | low | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola | 250 | 230 | breeding pairs | 92 | favourable |
Picoides tridactylus | 100 | 100 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus | 650 | 650 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus | 1,400 | 1,400 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Parrot Crossbill Loxia pytyopsittacus | 100 | 70 | breeding pairs | 70 | not assessed |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
No known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1996 | Etelä-Kuusamon metsät | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 96 |
1998 | Etelä-Kuusamon metsät | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
1999 | ETELÄ-KUUSAMON VANHOJEN METSIEN LUONNONSUOJELUALUE | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
2007 | Etelä-Kuusamon suojeluvedet | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 3 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 60 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Raised bogs | 40 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Närängänvaara-Virmajoki-Romevaara (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/närängänvaara-virmajoki-romevaara-iba-finland on 23/11/2024.