The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage | 2007 | 11,000 individuals | C3 |
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2007 | 151 males | C1 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | breeding | 2003 | 19 breeding pairs | C1 |
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa | NT | breeding | 2003-2009 | 9-14 breeding pairs | C1 |
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica | LC | breeding | 2003 | 74-76 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2003-2007 | 23,000-25,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | not assessed | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1988 | Czapliniec Kuznicki | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1989 | Dolina Noteci | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 65 |
2001 | Dolina Noteci | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 91 |
2007 | Nadnoteckie Łęgi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation, Fens, transition mires and springs | 90 |
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands | 10 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land | - |
Forest | Alluvial and very wet forest | - |
Shrubland | Scrub | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 100 |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Notec river flood-plain (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/notec-river-flood-plain-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.