Data Zone
The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:| Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage (2007) | 11,000 birds | C3 |
| Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding (2007) | 151 males | C1 |
| Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | breeding (2003) | 19 pairs | C1 |
| Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa | NT | breeding (2003–2009) | 9–14 pairs | C1 |
| Bluethroat Luscinia svecica | LC | breeding (2003) | 74–76 pairs | C6 |
| A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage (2003–2007) | 23,000–25,000 birds | C4 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
| IBA conservation assessment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
| 2010 | not assessed | high | medium |
| Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
| yes | unset | medium | |
| Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
| Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
| Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
| Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
| Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
| Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Czapliniec Kuznicki | Nature Reserve (IV) | <1 |
| Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
|---|---|---|
| Wetlands (inland) | 90 | Standing freshwater; Rivers and streams; Water fringe vegetation; Fens, transition mires and springs |
| Grassland | 10 | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland; Humid grasslands |
| Artificial/Terrestrial | - | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes; Arable land |
| Forest | - | Alluvial and very wet forest |
| Shrubland | - | Scrub |
| Land use | % of IBA |
|---|---|
| agriculture | 100 |
| hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Notec river flood-plain (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/notec-river-flood-plain-iba-poland on 23/12/2024.