• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Bean Goose Anser fabalis	LC	passage	2005-2009	12,000 individuals	C3
European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus	LC	breeding	2004-2009	200-600 breeding pairs	C6
Common Crane Grus grus	LC	breeding	2004-2008	120-150 breeding pairs	C6
Osprey Pandion haliaetus	LC	breeding	2008-2009	2 breeding pairs	C6
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla	LC	breeding	2008-2009	13-15 breeding pairs	C6
Red Kite Milvus milvus	LC	breeding	2008-2009	18-20 breeding pairs	C1, C6
Black Kite Milvus migrans	LC	breeding	2008-2009	15-18 breeding pairs	C6
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis	LC	breeding	2004-2009	70-85 breeding pairs	C6
Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius	LC	breeding	2004-2009	100-500 breeding pairs	C6
Woodlark Lullula arborea	LC	breeding	2004-2009	2,000-4,000 breeding pairs	C6
A4iii Species group - waterbirds	n/a	passage	2005-2009	20,000-25,000 individuals	C4

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species	Reference	Actual	Units	% remaining	Result
European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus	600	600	breeding pairs	100	favourable
Osprey Pandion haliaetus	2	1	breeding pairs	50	unfavourable
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla	15	15	breeding pairs	100	favourable
Red Kite Milvus milvus	20	20	breeding pairs	100	favourable
Milvus migrans	18	16	breeding pairs	89	near favourable
Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis	85	35	breeding pairs	42	unfavourable
Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius	800	600	breeding pairs	75	near favourable
Woodlark Lullula arborea	4,000	2,800	breeding pairs	70	near favourable

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Not assessed	Not assessed	Not assessed	not assessed

Year	Protected Area	Designation	% overlap with IBA
1957	Czaple Wyspy	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1958	Buki nad Jeziorem Lutomskim	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1959	Wełna	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1959	Czaplenice	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1959	Bagno Chlebowo	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1959	Łabędziniec	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1959	Czaplisko	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1960	Cegliniec	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1968	Mszar nad Jeziorem Mnich	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1968	Wilcze Błoto	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1987	Promenada	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1989	Puszcza Notecka	Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu	32
1989	Dolina Wełny i Rynna Gołaniecko-Wągrowiecka	Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu	2
1991	Sierakowski Park Krajobrazowy	Park Krajobrazowy	17
1998	H Międzychód	Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu	5
2000	Lubiatowskie Uroczyska	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
2002	Jezioro Kubek	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	1
2002	Bagno Chlebowo	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	<1
2002	Torfowisko Rzecińskie	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	<1
2002	Sieraków	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	<1
2003	Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu Pojezierze Puszczy Noteckiej	Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu	7
2006	Bukowy Ostrów	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
2007	Puszcza Notecka	Special Protection Area (Birds Directive)	100
2007	Jezioro Mnich	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	<1
2008	Jeziora Gościmskie	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	2
2008	Kiszewo	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	1
2008	Dolina Wełny	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	1
2008	Dolina Miały	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	<1
2008	Ostoja Międzychodzko-Sierakowska	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	3
2009	Goszczanowskie Źródliska	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
2009	Bagno Leszczyny	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
2009	Bory Chrobotkowe Puszczy Noteckiej	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	1

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Forest		78
Artificial/Terrestrial		13
Grassland		5
Other		2
Wetlands (inland)		2

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Notec Forest (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/notec-forest-iba-poland on 22/11/2024.