The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baer's Pochard Aythya baeri | CR | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A4i |
Little Pratincole Glareola lactea | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A4i |
Blyth's Kingfisher Alcedo hercules | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Jerdon's Bushchat Saxicola jerdoni | LC | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Nong Bong Kai | Non Hunting Area | 7 |
2001 | Nong Bong Kai Non-Hunting Area | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 7 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Savanna | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Nong Bong Kai (Thailand). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/nong-bong-kai-iba-thailand on 22/11/2024.