The site was identified as important in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2002) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2002. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | near favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | - | - | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2001 | Song Thanh | Khu Bảo tồn thiên nhiên | 56 |
2014 | Ngoc Linh (Kon Tum) | Khu Bảo tồn thiên nhiên | 44 |
2014 | Ngoc Linh (Quang Nam) | Khu Bảo tồn thiên nhiên | 12 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Hill evergreen forest (subtropical), Montane broadleaf evergreen forest (mont temp) | 90 |
Shrubland | Secondary scrub | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 62 |
nature conservation and research | 38 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ngoc Linh (Vietnam). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ngoc-linh-iba-vietnam on 22/11/2024.