The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
White-crowned Pigeon Patagioenas leucocephala | NT | resident (2006) | 150–300 birds | A1 |
Red-footed Booby Sula sula | LC | resident (2006) | 5,000–7,000 birds | A4ii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | poor | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens | 175 / 175 (birds) | 100 | good | ||
Red-footed Booby Sula sula | 6,000 / 6,000 (birds) | 100 | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
Shrubland | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Navassa Island | National Wildlife Refuge (IV) | 83 |
1999 | Navassa Island | National Wildlife Refuge (IV) | 89 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Forest | minor (<10) | Lowland evergreen rain forest (tropical) |
Shrubland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | minor (<10) |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Navassa (United States Minor Outlying Islands (to USA)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/navassa-iba-united-states-minor-outlying-islands-(to-usa) on 22/12/2024.