The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Indian Skimmer Rynchops albicollis | EN | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Pallas's Fish-eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus | EN | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | passage | 2004 | present | A1 |
A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes | n/a | passage | 2004 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iv |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | unknown | 2004 | min 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | favourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Very little or no conservation action taking place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1969 | Nal Sarovar | Sanctuary | 100 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Nalsarovar SSG (Recreation Youth Club) | 0 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Nalsarovar Wildlife Sanctuary (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/nalsarovar-wildlife-sanctuary-iba-india on 22/11/2024.