The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Masked Finfoot Heliopais personatus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Chinese Egret Egretta eulophotes | VU | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Spotted Greenshank Tringa guttifer | EN | winter | 2004 | present | A1, A4i |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A4i |
Lesser Crested Tern Thalasseus bengalensis | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | not assessed | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2001 | Krabi Estuary | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Mangrove forest (tropical) | 89 |
Marine Intertidal | 11 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Na Muang Krabi (Thailand). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/na-muang-krabi-iba-thailand on 23/11/2024.