RO075
Măxineni This is an IBA in Danger! 


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus LC passage (1990–2006) 66 birds C2
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis VU passage (1990–2006) 780 birds C1, C6
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons LC passage (1990–2006) 14,000–20,000 birds C3
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT breeding (1990–2006) 130–140 pairs C1, C6
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT passage (1990–2006) 550–720 birds C1, C2
Little Crake Zapornia parva LC breeding (1990–2006) 36 pairs C6
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida LC breeding (1990–2006) 400–500 pairs C2, C6
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a passage (1990–2006) 20,000 birds C4

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2016 very poor very high medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population good

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus 0 / 66 (birds) 0 very poor
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis 0 / 780 (birds) 0 very poor
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons 0 / 14,000 (birds) 0 very poor
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca 0 / 130 (birds) 0 very poor
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca 0 / 550 (birds) 0 very poor
Little Crake Zapornia parva 0 / 36 (pairs) 0 very poor
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida 0 / 400 (pairs) 0 very poor
A4iii Species group - waterbirds 1,000 / 20,000 (birds) 5 very poor

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Wetlands (inland) very poor (<40%) very poor (<40%) very poor
Grassland moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Natural system modifications happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Energy production and mining past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) A compre­hensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species Some limited conservation initiatives are in place medium

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Wetlands (inland) 76 Standing freshwater
Grassland 24 Steppes and dry calcareous grassland


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Măxineni (Romania). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/măxineni-iba-romania on 23/12/2024.