The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lesser Flamingo Phoeniconaias minor | NT | breeding | 1955 | 600 breeding pairs | A1 |
Coppery-tailed Coucal Centropus cupreicaudus | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
African Openbill Anastomus lamelligerus | LC | non-breeding | 1998 | 1,000 individuals | A4i |
Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis | LC | non-breeding | 1998 | 10,000 individuals | A4i |
Shoebill Balaeniceps rex | VU | resident | 1998 | present | A1 |
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus | LC | non-breeding | 1998 | 1,800 individuals | A4i |
Böhm's Bee-eater Merops boehmi | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Chirping Cisticola Cisticola pipiens | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Ploceus katangae | NR | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
Brown Firefinch Lagonosticta nitidula | LC | resident | 1998 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2005) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2005 | favourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | Unknown | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1971 | Mweru-Wantipa | National Park | 100 |
2007 | Mweru wa Ntipa | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 47 | |
Forest | 46 | |
Shrubland | 4 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Mweru Wantipa National Park (Zambia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/mweru-wantipa-national-park-iba-zambia on 22/11/2024.